### GCJ 2014 - 'Cookie Clicker Alpha' Problem

Posted on April 24, 2014

Below is the problem statement for 'Cookie Clicker Alpha' problem from the Google Code Jam - 2014:

Introduction
------------

Cookie Clicker is a Javascript game by Orteil, where players click on a picture of a giant cookie. Clicking on the giant cookie gives them cookies. They can spend those cookies to buy buildings. Those buildings help them get even more cookies. Like this problem, the game is very cookie-focused. This problem has a similar idea, but it does not assume you have played Cookie Clicker. Please don't go play it now: it might be a long time before you come back.

Problem
-------

Once you have X cookies that you haven't spent on farms, you win! Figure out how long it will take you to win if you use the best possible strategy.

Example
-------

Suppose C=500.0, F=4.0 and X=2000.0. Here's how the best possible strategy plays out:

After 250 seconds, you will have C=500 cookies and can buy a farm that produces F=4 cookies per second.
Another farm will cost 500 cookies, which you can buy after 50 seconds.
Another farm would cost 500 cookies, but it actually makes sense not to buy it: instead you can just wait until you have X=2000 cookies, which takes about 142.8571429 seconds.
Total time: 250 + 83.3333333 + 50 + 142.8571429 = 526.1904762 seconds.
Notice that you get cookies continuously: so 0.1 seconds after the game starts you'll have 0.2 cookies, and π seconds after the game starts you'll have 2π cookies.

Input
-----

The first line of the input gives the number of test cases, T. T lines follow. Each line contains three space-separated real-valued numbers: C, F and X, whose meanings are described earlier in the problem statement.

C, F and X will each consist of at least 1 digit followed by 1 decimal point followed by from 1 to 5 digits. There will be no leading zeroes.

Output
------

For each test case, output one line containing "Case #x: y", where x is the test case number (starting from 1) and y is the minimum number of seconds it takes before you can have X delicious cookies.

We recommend outputting y to 7 decimal places, but it is not required. y will be considered correct if it is close enough to the correct number: within an absolute or relative error of 10-6. See the FAQ for an explanation of what that means, and what formats of real numbers we accept.

Limits
------

1 ≤ T ≤ 100.

Small dataset
-------------

1 ≤ C ≤ 500.
1 ≤ F ≤ 4.
1 ≤ X ≤ 2000.

Large dataset
-------------

1 ≤ C ≤ 10000.
1 ≤ F ≤ 100.
1 ≤ X ≤ 100000.

Sample Input
------------

4
30.0 1.0 2.0
30.0 2.0 100.0
30.50000 3.14159 1999.19990
500.0 4.0 2000.0

Sample Ouput
------------

Case #1: 1.0000000
Case #2: 39.1666667
Case #3: 63.9680013
Case #4: 526.1904762

I solved the above problem easily, but made a big mistake by using Recursion, in my first attempt. As you know, Java uses Stack frames for storing method calls, variables, Return Addresses and parameters. So, when you use Recursion, the Stack memory might not be sufficient for completing the program's functionality. This mistake also made me think of 'Recursion Depth' and coded a fast program to find the 'Recursion Depth' on my JVM. Below is the program, which used Recursion (works for small dataset, but not for the large one):

Below is my solution in Java, which doesn't use Recursion and works for both small and large datasets:

And the link to the Github Java Gist: GCJ 2014 - 'Cookie Clicker Alpha' problem solution

Recent Posts
Blog Categories

#### js

Disclaimer
The views expressed on this blog are my personal views and do not reflect the views of my employer or campaigns I am supporting.

All sample code is provided for illustrative purposes only. These examples have not been thoroughly tested under all conditions. The writer therefore, cannot guarantee or imply reliability, serviceability, or function of these programs.

All programs contained herein are provided to you "AS IS" without any warranties of any kind. The implied warranties of non-infringement, merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose are expressly disclaimed.